View Full Version : Trick Flow Intake....
Junior2561
02-13-2007, 08:45 AM
Summit Has the new trick flow intake in there catalog now.:cool:
:deal: Kieth, if you are reading this i'll be a test dummy for the intake :cool:
SableGTO
02-13-2007, 08:46 AM
This thread is worthless without a link and/or picture.
Junior2561
02-13-2007, 09:01 AM
Newest catalog, on the first mustang page
mogs01gt
02-13-2007, 12:03 PM
Should be a decent piece but the one issue I see is that you have to use the "spider"(I think that is the name) of plenum. You cant use the stock plenum setup with the new intake.
SableGTO
02-13-2007, 12:32 PM
Really???
hmmm
BIG SHOT DYNO
02-13-2007, 04:50 PM
I dont have the new book but if it is the intake that includes the lower they tested it at the shop and it did not do so good.
SableGTO
02-13-2007, 08:01 PM
I dont have the new book but if it is the intake that includes the lower they tested it at the shop and it did not do so good.
Was it tested on a car with ported heads?
BIG SHOT DYNO
02-13-2007, 09:51 PM
Couple different ways.
Junior2561
02-14-2007, 08:03 AM
Meh, i didn't have the cash anyways. I haven't forgot about the ET streets yet Keith, i am waiting to buy a car first before i make any toy purchases.
mogs01gt
02-14-2007, 08:50 AM
here it is
http://www.stangfreak.com/pictures/TrickFlow1_650.jpg
http://www.stangfreak.com/pictures/TrickFlow2_650.jpg
Junior2561
02-14-2007, 08:52 AM
thats the edelbrock intake for carbs isn't ?
mogs01gt
02-14-2007, 08:53 AM
thats the edelbrock intake for carbs isn't ?
yeah I copy and pasted the wrong link and now I cant figure out how to delete it.
*EDIT*
I corrected the image and Im wrong, I was thinking about the Edelbrock that needed the different plenum
Junior2561
02-14-2007, 09:06 AM
yeah there it is :cool: i still like the Bullitt looks wise. I wish the price would come down on those. Wouldn't do much for me NA but they do look nice :D
mogs01gt
02-14-2007, 09:25 AM
Those runners look a lot bigger than the stock PI intake and the stock Bullitt intake.
1SLOW46
02-14-2007, 09:30 AM
the trickflow intake is sweet...for the price and it being a metal piece it is definately worth it...
Junior2561
02-14-2007, 09:37 AM
if you can get it port matched to the heads on a FI car i would hope it makes great numbers. But for NA, the Stock Platic piece w/ a new pleum and TB can't be beat IMO.
1SLOW46
02-14-2007, 09:46 AM
true with FI this intake will make great power...They made the intake especially for ported motors and FI...This also comes in black which looks killer
2003cobra
02-14-2007, 12:46 PM
Could someone post a link?
2003cobra
02-14-2007, 06:37 PM
nevermind, I see the pics now
kurt02gt
02-14-2007, 06:52 PM
I heard you can get it with a GT TB or Cobra TB opening. I also been hearing it will not fit a lot of blower combos so I'm not sure if this will be a intake for FI guys, we will see!
Junior2561
02-14-2007, 07:53 PM
Kurt, i have heard the same too, due to having to flip the Alt. Maybe turbo or N20????
1SLOW46
02-14-2007, 08:15 PM
it will fit the centris...
kurt02gt
02-14-2007, 09:15 PM
it will fit the centris...
do you have one to know this for sure?
I'm asuming it will fit like a Bullitt intake FI application:noidea:
1SLOW46
02-14-2007, 09:55 PM
they made it so it would clear various centris
kurt02gt
02-14-2007, 10:11 PM
I know that has been a concern for a lot of guys on the MD. I hope they do, if not they might of shot themselves in the foot by not making it fit FI motors.
I can't wait to see the numbers it produce. I'm not expecting much for NA but FI guys should make good numbers over the stock intake.
1SLOW46
02-14-2007, 11:37 PM
stock cars may not benifit from it due to the runner length but ported heads and FI will love it
2003cobra
02-15-2007, 07:10 AM
I be that thinhg would look sweet polished.
kurt02gt
02-15-2007, 09:15 AM
stock cars may not benifit from it due to the runner length but ported heads and FI will love it
sounds like someone has $700 set aside for a new intake. :)
Junior2561
02-15-2007, 09:25 AM
799 in the catalog.
kurt02gt
02-15-2007, 09:35 AM
799 in the catalog.
I'm sure AHP is a Summit Dealer so he will get the discounted price, might not be that cheap but it will be cheaper then $799
1SLOW46
02-15-2007, 09:58 AM
not sure what intake i am going with yet
mogs01gt
02-15-2007, 10:00 AM
Time to start saving up those summit bucks ;).
BIG SHOT DYNO
02-15-2007, 05:34 PM
N/a it lost almost 10tq at the wheels and a little power on a bolt on car.
1SLOW46
02-15-2007, 05:40 PM
Was that on the original one or the one they made for production...
BIG SHOT DYNO
02-15-2007, 06:56 PM
I believe production i will find out.
1SLOW46
03-15-2007, 10:14 PM
http://www.modularfords.com/forums/mustang-gt/the-trick-flow-manifold-is-here-77389-8.html#post832052
kurt02gt
03-15-2007, 11:29 PM
not impressed but we will see if it gains anything over the plastic intake :drink:
e5shea
03-15-2007, 11:52 PM
if you're sportin' a new edge, you won't see anymore hp/tq than if you keep your stock intake with the 75mm accufab w/plenum.
kurt02gt
03-18-2007, 12:26 AM
if you're sportin' a new edge, you won't see anymore hp/tq than if you keep your stock intake with the 75mm accufab w/plenum.
Correct, a bullitt intake was worth 3-5rwhp on NA cars. Not a good investment. Now add a PA of some sort then you are in a different ball game.
I see this intake raising the power band but suffers on the low to mid range for NA motors.
Now this is the best NA intake in my opinion out on the market right now http://modularmisfits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3258
http://modularmisfits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3183
2003cobra
03-18-2007, 10:44 AM
Man that thing looks wicked....Looking at all these cool parts for the 2v's coming out over the lase couple years I'm getting the itch to do a 2v project car.
1SLOW46
03-22-2007, 09:55 PM
Here is some more pics of the intake and how it will fit with centris...
http://www.modularfords.com/forums/mustang-gt/the-trick-flow-manifold-is-here-77389-12.html
BlkBullitt
03-26-2007, 11:03 AM
Correct, a bullitt intake was worth 3-5rwhp on NA cars. Not a good investment. Now add a PA of some sort then you are in a different ball game.
I see this intake raising the power band but suffers on the low to mid range for NA motors.
Now this is the best NA intake in my opinion out on the market right now http://modularmisfits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3258
http://modularmisfits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3183
Looks like they borrowed some design ideas from the 2000 Cobra R Intake.
I'd like to see them take a bone stock 99-04 GT 5 Speed and do the following:
1. Basline Dyno
2. Tune the stock GT and do another Dyno
3. Swap to their Intake Manifold, TB, CAI combo and do another Dyno
4. Tune the car with the new Manifold setup and do anyother Dyno
I like looking at the sheet they posted, but when the car also has "... MAC headers, mildly ported heads, VT stage 2 cams, full exhaust..." it's basically impossible to tell how the intake manifold will benefit the typical GT (especially since they have stage 2 cams which will greatly effect your power curve to begin with).
kurt02gt
04-09-2007, 02:34 PM
before you spend your hard earn money read this first http://forums.modulardepot.com/4-6l-2v-tech/99967-warning-dont-believe-5-0-mags-test-trick-flow-intake.html
E Green SVT
04-09-2007, 02:43 PM
before you spend your hard earn money read this first http://forums.modulardepot.com/4-6l-2v-tech/99967-warning-dont-believe-5-0-mags-test-trick-flow-intake.html
hm. Something isnt adding up here, whats going on? :idiot:
:rock:
mogs01gt
04-09-2007, 02:57 PM
The only thing that is messed up about the dyno is the baseline. It could be a whole bunch of issues. Im gonna assume the Trickflow intake was installed and a tune was completed so that the extra air flow would be handled which causing the engine to run majorly lean.
kurt02gt
04-09-2007, 03:00 PM
yeah the baseline is way off so that makes the TF numbers hard to compare to the baseline. Without a accurate baseline the difference mean nothing
mogs01gt
04-09-2007, 03:08 PM
I would only care if the baseline was suppose to be off a stock car and it wasnt. Of course, I could careless about the baseline since my car is far from stock.
kurt02gt
04-09-2007, 03:11 PM
I can careless also since I was not in the market for a intake but for someone that was cares alot. I rather see aftermarket parts first dynoed against stock motors and then against a modded motor so you can see the true performance of the product.
1SLOW46
04-09-2007, 03:17 PM
before you spend your hard earn money read this first http://forums.modulardepot.com/4-6l-2v-tech/99967-warning-dont-believe-5-0-mags-test-trick-flow-intake.html
yes it is tue that the wrong numbers were printed in the mag here are the correct numbers...Nice try tryin to start crap Kurt
RPM BASELINE BASELINE TFS TFS DIFF DIFF
POWER TORQUE POWER TORQUE POWER TORQUE
1500 65.42 229.06 N/A N/A N/A N/A
1600 69.67 228.70 N/A N/A N/A N/A
1700 73.55 227.23 73.54 227.17 -0.01 -0.06
1800 78.81 229.95 81.75 238.53 2.94 8.58
1900 86.12 238.06 89.32 246.91 3.20 8.85
2000 92.74 243.54 96.23 252.70 3.49 9.16
2100 100.56 251.50 101.98 255.05 1.42 3.55
2200 106.19 253.51 106.58 254.43 0.39 0.92
2300 111.06 253.61 110.92 253.29 -0.14 -0.32
2400 116.30 254.51 115.96 253.76 -0.34 -0.75
2500 118.40 248.74 121.98 256.26 3.58 7.52
2600 120.73 243.88 128.13 258.83 7.40 14.95
2700 127.01 247.06 134.47 261.58 7.46 14.52
2800 134.27 251.86 139.82 262.27 5.55 10.41
2900 140.06 253.66 144.97 262.54 4.91 8.88
3000 146.03 255.65 150.47 263.42 4.44 7.77
3100 153.18 259.52 155.98 264.27 2.80 4.75
3200 156.40 256.70 160.86 264.02 4.46 7.32
3300 164.93 262.49 166.24 264.57 1.31 2.08
3400 172.39 266.30 171.61 265.09 -0.78 -1.21
3500 179.07 268.71 176.75 265.24 -2.32 -3.47
3600 185.23 270.23 181.82 265.26 -3.41 -4.97
3700 191.41 271.70 187.14 265.65 -4.27 -6.05
3800 198.66 274.57 191.97 265.33 -6.69 -9.24
3900 204.44 275.32 197.79 266.37 -6.65 -8.95
4000 210.66 276.60 203.24 266.86 -7.42 -9.74
4100 215.06 275.49 209.67 268.59 -5.39 -6.90
4200 219.13 274.02 215.06 268.93 -4.07 -5.09
4300 222.51 271.78 220.70 269.56 -1.81 -2.22
4400 225.31 268.94 225.58 269.26 0.27 0.32
4500 227.82 265.90 230.26 268.75 2.44 2.85
4600 230.24 262.88 233.83 266.98 3.59 4.10
4700 233.40 260.82 237.99 265.95 4.59 5.13
4800 235.32 257.48 240.90 263.60 5.58 6.12
4900 235.69 252.63 243.72 261.24 8.03 8.61
5000 234.27 246.08 245.26 257.63 10.99 11.55
5100 233.22 240.17 247.50 254.89 14.28 14.72
5200 230.85 233.16 248.48 250.97 17.63 17.81
5300 228.93 226.86 248.99 246.74 20.06 19.88
5400 226.05 219.86 246.19 239.45 20.14 19.59
5500 225.99 215.80 244.46 233.45 18.47 17.65
5600 224.83 210.86 243.75 228.61 18.92 17.75
5700 222.83 205.32 241.64 222.65 18.81 17.33
5800 219.58 198.84 238.65 216.11 19.07 17.27
5900 215.70 192.01 234.36 208.63 18.66 16.62
6000 211.60 185.22 233.66 204.53 22.06 19.31
kurt02gt
04-09-2007, 03:19 PM
not starting anything, just posting facts. I'll let the consumer decide.
mogs01gt
04-09-2007, 03:21 PM
Where did that post ago about the 100 point difference? I know I just saw it. was it deleted?
The gain above 5k is awesome. I bet I would be hitting 330+rwhp with that intake.
1SLOW46
04-09-2007, 03:23 PM
well see what everyones opinion is when they are available...i know i like the results and they will even be higher on FI cars...Well be doing the tests on mine when it is done
kurt02gt
04-09-2007, 03:29 PM
well see what everyones opinion is when they are available...i know i like the results and they will even be higher on FI cars...Well be doing the tests on mine when it is done
charles, I was excited to see this intake be a good NA/FI intake.
The only thing I have a issue with is you come on here posting the same dyno number before the mag was released. Even on other forums. Heck even on AHP. But you or your buddies did not catch the error (if it was really a error) until Modular Depot brings it to light. You even defended your numbers. But Brian from TFS comes on the scene and posts it was wrong and with new numbers. Then you are like yeah they were wrong, I call BS dude, sorry but I don't believe it. You guys are pushing how great this intake is and you are going to tell me you did see the wrong dyno numbers being posted by the mag or even by yourself?
E Green SVT
04-09-2007, 03:29 PM
What I dont understand, Like kurt said in the thread is, you say the numbers are correct on the first page of the thread, then another guy shows up with other numbers that are correct on the third page, and then u say those are right...I dont really understand that.
E Green SVT
04-09-2007, 03:36 PM
charles, I was excited to see this intake be a good NA/FI intake.
The only thing I have a issue with is you come on here posting the same dyno number before the mag was released. Even on other forums. Heck even on AHP. But you or your buddies did not catch the error (if it was really a error) until Modular Depot brings it to light. You even defended your numbers. But Brian from TFS comes on the scene and posts it was wrong and with new numbers. Then you are like yeah they were wrong, I call BS dude, sorry but I don't believe it. You guys are pushing how great this intake is and you are going to tell me you did see the wrong dyno numbers being posted by the mag or even by yourself?
+1 Something smells fishy...
1SLOW46
04-09-2007, 09:17 PM
charles, I was excited to see this intake be a good NA/FI intake.
The only thing I have a issue with is you come on here posting the same dyno number before the mag was released. Even on other forums. Heck even on AHP. But you or your buddies did not catch the error (if it was really a error) until Modular Depot brings it to light. You even defended your numbers. But Brian from TFS comes on the scene and posts it was wrong and with new numbers. Then you are like yeah they were wrong, I call BS dude, sorry but I don't believe it. You guys are pushing how great this intake is and you are going to tell me you did see the wrong dyno numbers being posted by the mag or even by yourself?
I didnt have the dyno sheets in front of me this weekend.Obviously...AHP cant control what is printed in the Mag..Obviously i was defending the shop as they dont control what is printed...
1SLOW46
04-09-2007, 09:18 PM
+1 Something smells fishy...
get off his bandwagon dude...
1SLOW46
04-09-2007, 09:22 PM
What I dont understand, Like kurt said in the thread is, you say the numbers are correct on the first page of the thread, then another guy shows up with other numbers that are correct on the third page, and then u say those are right...I dont really understand that.
like i told kurt i was defending the fact that it wasnt inflated numbers by the shop or TFS...just a typo i didnt have the exact sheets in front of me so there ya go...
E Green SVT
04-09-2007, 09:22 PM
Wow...Lol, very nice charles...Thats a great explanation...
Junior2561
04-10-2007, 06:31 AM
i'm not going to pursicute (sp/) anyone here, but if i recall, you did say you saw it with your own eyes? Not stiring the pot or anything, but i thought you were there when or after the car was dyno'd.
At any rate, i hope the intake performs well, hopefully MD can do a shoot out between the bullitt, stock, p51, TF and BBKs new one coming out. Should be good reasons to sta 2v :cool:
e5shea
04-11-2007, 08:33 PM
I still stand by no hp/tq increase over the 75mm accufab & plenum set up. I'll stand by this until somebody wants to do a trick flow swap on my car and get it dyno'd afterwards. My accufab set up was worth 11 rwhp, and it only cost me $390 from www.americanmuscle.com (http://www.americanmuscle.com)
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.3 Copyright © 2010 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.